Programs:

The OHI focuses on three portfolio areas of interest, Research, Education, and Best Practices, and undertakes Special Projects, General information on these portfolios can be found below, while recent current efforts are described under Updates.

Research

  • Research on headwater issues forms the foundation of the OHI's work and the basis for education and engagement programs.
  • Currently, the OHi is assessing regulatory models for headwater protection and monitoring.
  • General research was distilled in 2009 in Introduction to Freshwater and Headwater Issues, available below in both html and as a PDF.

Education

  • In late 2009 the OHI completed work on a generic 25-minute presentation The Importance of Headwaters, which can be delivered as a standalone program or as part of a community workshop, both described under Special Projects below and under Updates. Content includes an introduction to headwaters and the hydrologic cycle, a photographic slide show- Headwaters: The Foundation of our Watersheds – and descriptions of the challenges, strengths, and opportunities we face in preserving Ontario’s headwaters.

Best Practices

  • OHI efforts on best practices include introductory material contained in the presentation referred to above and inquiries with key Ontario agencies on policies, protocols, and metrics designed to implement and monitor headwater preservation under the new definition of a watercourse as contained in the Conservation Authorities Act of 2006: “ ‘ watercourse’ means an identifiable depression in the ground in which a flow of water regularly or continuously occurs.”

Special Projects

 

March 27, 2009  Staged Preserving Ontario’s Freshwater, a symposium
with over 100 attendees. Summarized under Updates
March 4 - April 8, 2010  A series of seven community workshops, delivered from Elora to Peterborough, on Preserving Ontario’s Headwaters, funded by the Ontario Trillium Foundation.
See Updates.
May 11, 2010 Our second annual symposium: Integrated Watershed Management in Ontario

     


Introduction to Freshwater and Headwater Issues Printer-Friendly PDF version
Contents:  A Global Perspective on Water
Freshwater in Ontario
The Importance of Headwaters
Ontario’s Headwaters
Preserving Ontario’s Headwaters

No new water is being created on our planet.

OceanInstead, water moves in a hydrological cycle, rising from oceans and forests, condensing into clouds, falling back to the land, flowing through the landscape, and returning to the oceans.

The water that we drink today might well have been water that dinosaurs drank millions of years ago, or that formed a part of the swells that Columbus sailed across to reach North America.

Most of the water on the earth, however, is salt-water, and much of the rest is locked in ice. Approximate distribution is:

Oceans: 97.40 %
Ice caps, Glaciers and Groundwater  2.58 %
Atmosphere, Rivers, Biota, Soil Moisture, & Lakes .014 

In other words, less than 3% of the world’s water is freshwater. About two thirds of that is currently frozen, and another good portion is underground, leaving a tiny fraction for the five remaining categories that all living creatures must share. Put another way, if all the earth's water could fit into a gallon jug, the available freshwater would equal just over a tablespoon.

Humankind’s very existence depends on having access to clean water. A person can live about a month without food, but only about a week without water, while water that has been polluted or that contains pathogens can make people sick, or worse. In fact, the UN is currently discussing ways to elaborate a universal right-to-water. For example, a committee of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights recently stated that:

The right to water contains both freedoms and entitlements.  The freedoms include the right to maintain access to existing water supplies necessary for the right to water, and the right to be free from interference, such as the right to be free from arbitrary disconnections or contamination of water supplies.  By contrast, the entitlements include the right to a system of water supply and management that provides equality of opportunity for people to enjoy the right to water. 

To help advance the discussion in the UN, Maude Barlow, national chairperson of the Council of Canadians and founder of the Blue Planet Project, was appointed in October, 2008, as the first Senior Advisor on water issues for the 63rd session of the General Assembly.

We cannot, however, be complacent.

To begin with, we must deal with the myth of abundance, caused perhaps by the presence of the Great Lakes – the sweet-water seas - lapping at the doorstep of so many of our cities.

Putting the myth into perspective, it is worth noting that most of Canada’s freshwater does not even flow from the Great Lakes to the St Lawrence. The flows into each of the Mackenzie and Ungava bays equal the flow from the Great Lakes, while the flow into Hudson Bay, with a watershed covering one third of Canada, is more than twice that of the Great Lakes.

This is due in part to the fact that much of the water in the Great Lakes is a reservoir left from the last ice age. Lake Superior, the lake with the largest volume and that feeds its four sisters, receives only about 1% of its volume as inflow each year from its sources. A drier climate that reduces precipitation or headwater flow into Lake Superior would reduce its level and its outflow. Warmer winters that preclude the formation of ice would result in increased evaporation, again reducing the level of and the flow from the lake.

The examples above illustrate distinctions between water income and water capital. Water income generally refers to precipitation, while water capital refers to the freshwater in our wetlands, groundwater, rivers, and lakes. Obviously, a society that uses its water capital more quickly than it can be refreshed from its income, or that reduces its water income through climate change, will eventually deplete that capital.

A second reason to abandon complacency involves pollution. As cited in an old African proverb, “Filthy water cannot be washed”, so we pollute that precious tablespoon of freshwater that we have at our peril.

Clearly, society has come a long way since it acted as if the solution to pollution was dilution, the early days of virtually unregulated industrial effluent, and since the extensive eutrophication of Lake Erie in 1953 from excessive phosphorus.

Nonetheless, we continue to have communities with inadequate waste water treatment and boil water advisories, restrictions on the consumption of various fish stocks, poor-to-illegal waste disposal practices, leaching landfills, and potential carcinogens and endocrine disrupters in the food chain.

The Walkerton tragedy was a significant wake-up call that has resulted in renewed initiatives on drinking water.

The province and the federal government, along with their American counterparts and cities around the Great Lakes basin, are shifting into a new gear to protect drinking water, and Ontario in particular is sending signals on its desire to extend its approach on drinking water source protection to a broader framework for watershed management. At the same time, history may be coming full circle, as Lake Simcoe has been identified as being severely stressed from, among other things, too much phosphorus.

The Ontario Headwaters Institute applauds the province’s emerging framework. We also think, however, that there is a need for Ontarians to do a better job of preserving our headwaters: our groundwater, aquifers, and the sources of our rivers and lakes.

 

The Importance of Headwaters

EcosystemsWhile some precipitation - our water income, as described in the previous section – falls directly into our largest freshwater reservoirs, most falls into the vast headwater areas of our watersheds.

As a result, preserving the integrity of these headwaters is fundamental to the health of our ecosystems, and to the availability of water for our health and well-being.

There are many world-wide examples of sound and poor headwaters preservation.

On the positive side:

  • In the western US, nearly all of the major waterways and 75% of the water supply for people originates in National Forests, an historic model of long-term planning;
  • In the US north-east, New York City has sought to protect its water far into the future through a watershed alliance spanning two watersheds, 1,969 square miles, and 19 reservoirs. The alliance involves the City, State, 7 counties, and 72 municipalities, as well as regional environmentalists and farmers while both protecting drink water and seeking to strengthen rural economies; and,
  • Recently, Ontario created a 1.8 million acre Greenbelt, purported to be the largest in the world. The Greenbelt is land-use planning approach that addresses several regional challenges, including the protection of forests, agricultural lands, the headwaters for many Ontario rivers, and aquifers. Ontario is also pursuing the development drinking water source protection planning, which appears headed toward embracing broader watershed management issues that may include additional headwaters protection.

On a more ominous note:

The Aral Sea, 1973 - 2004
Aral Sea
  • In central Asia, upstream diversion for irrigation turned the taps against the Aral Sea, once the world’sfourth-largest inland sea. Not only has the Aral dwindled  into three small lakes, these waters are polluted, local winds now pick up and distribute salts from what used to be sea-bottom and, to add hubris to ecological calamity, the cotton crops for which the irrigated water was used have failed;
  • There are reasoned concerns that the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world’s largest and which provides water to 8 states containing 27% of the irrigated land in the US, is being pumped dry. Water levels have been falling steadily since the 1950’s, as recharge cannot keep pace with extraction. Costs to pump ever-deeper water are escalating, while some project the aquifer will run dry at current pumping rates by 2030; and,
  • Around the worlds, cities are increasingly drawing water from ever-greater distances, affecting the availability of water for those regions. Key examples include Las Vegas and Beijing, but cities in south-central Ontario that have until now relied on groundwater may soon be seeking pipelines to bring water from outside their natural watersheds to their residents.

The message is clear: we need to live within both our watersheds and within our water income or we will upset ecological norms at the same time as we march systematic toward water shortages and drought.

 

Environment Canada recognizes the importance of headwaters through, amongst other initiatives, research that suggests that a healthy watershed is one that retains a minimum of 35% of its area in natural cover and 10% in wetland – modest objectives for rural watersheds that become difficult to maintain when faced with extensive agriculture, water-intense industrial activity, or urbanization.

In Ontario, in spite of the significant loss of wetlands and headwater streams in the urbanized swath north of Lake Ontario, key headwater areas define much of the landscape. Picture for a moment the imposing spine of the Niagara Escarpment and the rolling beauty of the Oak Ridges Moraine. A bit further north lies the magnificent canopy of the Algonquin Dome. The first of these contains the headwaters of 8 Ontario watersheds, the second 20, and the third 7.

LakeAs clear a path as these waterways carve, headwater areas also feed a complex labyrinth of underground streams and aquifers. In addition to re-emerging elsewhere to feed springs and creeks, this groundwater performs an important function for Ontario communities not drawing their water from surface sources. As captured by Justice Dennis O'Connor in Part Two of his Report of the Walkerton Enquiry,"Confined aquifers are the preferred sources of drinking water, because
slow filtration through the aquitard helps to purge the groundwater of potential pathogens."

In addition to the Niagara Escarpment, Oak Ridges Moraine, and the Algonquin Dome, consider for a moment of the sprawling boreal and taiga of Ontario’s north. Canada, with 1.9% of the world’s land mass, receives about 6.5% of the world’s precipitation. While our population is concentrated in the south, most of the precipitation falls in the north, which of course has relatively little soil, thanks to successive ice ages. Ontario’s north is, therefore, is a huge headwater area of forests, muskeg, rivers, and lakes, flowing to the arctic.

While it may look daunting and invulnerable, dams can alter local ecosystems and impact the seasonal flow of freshwater to the arctic, human activity can release pollutants to a fragile ecosystem with fewer of the natural buffers than are found in the south, and of course a hotter climate could devastate northern forests that both filter water and sequester carbon.

As custodians of so much of the world’s water, Canadians and Ontarians cannot be responsible stewards of water without preserving our headwaters.

 

Currently, much of our regulatory and stewardship approach to water focuses on water capital and is just starting to move upstream. Key initiatives focus of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, storm- and waste water management, local appeals to conservation buttressed by increased costs for municipal water, the world-class land-use planning effort on the 1.8 million acre Greenbelt mentioned above, and source protection planning and other safeguards aimed at drinking water. In addition, the Provincial Policy Statement offers protection for wetlands, although primarily for “provincially significant” wetlands rather than for wetlands in general.

RiverThe importance of a strategic and comprehensive approach to headwaters preservation is, however,
clearly emerging, from a number of directions. For example, Ontario has been pursuing groundwater surveys across the province for a number of years and is developing low water response plans driven by the realities of rivers and large wetlands running dry in recent years. There are also two moratoria in place that have headwater implications: one against inter-basin water transfers and another against new permits to take water.

More importantly, coming out of the Walkerton tragedy, the Clean Water Act (2005) has resulted in many new initiatives that clearly centre on drinking water but which include provisions to be expanded to ecosystem-focused, watershed-based planning. For example, a pre-Walkerton federal-provincial inventory of Ontario’s water quantity has been transitioned into a task upon conservation authorities to develop water budgets for each of their watersheds. Other programs being considered can be seen in Watershed-based Source Protection Planning, a report from a committee of technical experts that guided the development of the Act and which can be accessed from the Library page of this website.

While the provincial government seeks to codify how to protect headwaters in regulation and implementation, the OHI will both comment on agency plans and seek ways to involve all segments of society in headwaters preservation through research, education, and best practices.

Broad areas for future efforts may include:

  • Contributing to consistent technical definitions of headwaters, be they first order streams, wetlands, groundwater, and aquifers;
  • Identifying ways to distinguish and balance ecological needs against human demand – ie: living off water income and not draining water capital;
  • Extending key aspects of the source water protection regime to full watersheds;
  • Preserving and/or restoring wetlands drained for agricultural, municipal, or industrial purposes; and,
  • Identifying the implications of and strategies to address alterations to the hydrological regime in a changing climate.

The OHI believes that we all need to help preserve our headwaters for our children, the health of Ontario’s diverse ecosystems, and a sustainable future.

©2009. Ontario Headwaters Institute. All Rights Reserved

IT Services provided by Canadiansplash..